What is a Fabre Defendant in Florida?
Fabre Defendants in Florida Personal Injury Cases – Key Facts, Origin, and Protecting Your Compensation.
In the state of Florida, tort law protects your right to sue for damages caused by the negligence of others. However, certain cases, such as auto accidents, may involve multiple negligent parties. If you have been injured in an accident and are currently investigating your legal options, you may have come across — and been confused by — the term, “Fabre defendant.”
Legal Framework
What is a Fabre Defendant?
A Fabre defendant is someone partially at fault for an incident but not directly named in the lawsuit as a defendant. In negligence cases, the defense may argue that another individual or group shares responsibility, even if the plaintiff did not initially identify them. For example, in an auto accident, if a car rear-ends you after swerving to avoid a reckless driver in their lane, the defense might argue that the reckless driver also shares liability. By naming this third party as a Fabre defendant, the court could allocate a portion of the fault to them, reducing the damages owed by the named defendant. This tactic, while not focused on the Fabre defendant’s primary liability, can significantly impact the compensation you ultimately receive.
Why Fabre Defendants Are Often Missed
There are a variety of reasons a Fabre defendant might not have been named in the suit. The person suing may not have identified this party as bearing any responsibility. In some cases, they may not realize a potential Fabre defendant is even relevant to the case. If a suit is filed without sufficient investigation, it is easy to skip over important factors. This simple mistake might be a crucial one, because relying on the Fabre defense can help defendants reduce their overall liability and avoid paying full damages. In such cases, the victim could end up receiving less compensation than they are owed.
The Role of Comparative Negligence in Fabre Defenses
Fabre defendants are closely tied to Florida’s comparative negligence law, which allow fault to be distributed among multiple parties based on their degree of responsibility. Under this system, each party is liable for damages proportional to their percentage of fault. However, this can also affect the victim’s compensation—if the victim is found partially responsible, their recovery amount is reduced by their share of the liability.
When a Fabre defendant is introduced, it further shifts the distribution of fault. For instance, if the court assigns 20% of the fault to a Fabre defendant, the liability for the named defendant decreases, reducing the damages they owe. This can create significant complications if the Fabre defendant isn’t initially identified in the lawsuit. Since they are not directly involved in the case, they cannot be held accountable for their share of the damages, leaving the victim to shoulder the financial shortfall.
The Case That Defined the Fabre Doctrine: Fabre v. Marin
Because the distribution of liability plays such a central role in determining financial responsibility, all involved parties must be considered. Inevitably, lawsuits can arise which do not properly account for everyone’s liability. This possibility was addressed in the resolution of a specific case: Fabre v. Marin.
What Happened?
In 1993, Ann Marin was injured in an auto accident as a passenger in her husband’s vehicle. To recover damages, she filed a suit against Mrs. Sue Fabre, whom she believed to be responsible for the accident. According to her, Mrs. Fabre had pulled in front of the Marins’ vehicle unexpectedly, causing her husband to swerve into a nearby guardrail. During trial proceedings, the defense noted that Mrs. Marin was just a passenger. On the other hand, her husband, Mr. Ramon Marin, played an active role as the driver. Even if Mrs. Fabre negligently changed lanes in front of him, the defense argued that Mr. Marin still bore some responsibility for the incident.
Part of a driver’s responsibility is awareness of their surroundings, so it could be argued that Mr. Marin was also negligent in his driving. Mrs. Fabre’s defense team requested that the court evaluate his percentage of fault, and not just hers.
Who Was At Fault?
The jury determined that Mrs. Marin, the injured party, was owed a total amount of $357,750. The jury also found Mr. Marin 50% at fault.
Ordinarily, this might lead to a simple result: both parties must pay 50% of the total damages. However, the judge declared Mr. Marin exempt, because of a principle called interspousal immunity. In other words, since Mr. Marin was married to the victim, he was not expected to pay her any damages. The full compensation amount instead rested squarely on the shoulders of the original defendant, Mrs. Fabre.
What Was The Outcome?
Fortunately for Mrs. Fabre, the Florida Supreme Court intervened and overturned the judge’s decision. The justices decided that a defendant could not be held liable for damages greater than their percentage of fault. Therefore, while Mr. Marin still did not have to pay any damages, Mrs. Fabre only had to pay 50%. Mr. Marin was the original Fabre defendant. Though not originally party to the lawsuit, his percentage of fault ultimately changed the outcome of this case and many to follow. The case of Fabre v. Marin established an important precedent that would become known as the Fabre Doctrine. Defendants are permitted to submit other parties to be considered for liability because an accurate distribution of fault is necessary to ensure a fair result.
Abuse Explained
Types of Abuse in Nursing Homes
The result of Fabre v. Marin was not ideal for everyone involved. Ultimately, Mrs. Marin only received 50% of the compensation amount owed, due to her husband’s immunity. This highlights an imperfection in the Fabre defense: successful use of the tactic often comes with negative implications for the victim.
How the Fabre Doctrine Affects Your Case
When pursuing litigation in Florida, the Fabre Doctrine poses a challenge in your ability to receive full compensation. If found liable, a Fabre defendant cannot be immediately made to pay their share. Further litigation may be required in order to obtain the rest of what you are owed.
Additionally, if the defense suspects they will be able to reduce their liability, they are not likely to agree to a large settlement. Instead, they may exaggerate the fault of a Fabre defendant to get you to accept a reduced amount. Therefore, it is essential to prepare yourself adequately for the potential of a Fabre defense. Before filing, consider hiring a lawyer to help you reinforce your case.
How a Florida Personal Injury Lawyer Can Help
An attorney’s understanding of comparative negligence laws and ability to anticipate challenges such as a Fabre defense can help protect your rights and strengthen your case. Here’s how an attorney can assist:
1. Identifying All Liable Parties Ahead of Time
A personal injury lawyer can prepare for your lawsuit by applying their expertise and professional connections to get more information. When you hire an attorney, they will investigate every detail of the accident and work to obtain necessary documentation. All this investigation works towards building your case. In addition, they may reach out to experts to get relevant testimony. Your lawyer’s investigation may reveal multiple liable parties, which can help you preempt a Fabre defense.
2. Knowing the Law
Just because the defense names a Fabre defendant does not mean that party is actually liable. You may feel threatened with the possibility of losing compensation, but your attorney is not likely to fall for intimidation tactics. Instead, they rely on their own expertise to build a solid case you can feel confident about. An attorney can also identify potential holes in the defense’s argument in real time, keeping you one step ahead.
3. Devising Counter Strategies
A lawyer will be better equipped to know when to expect a Fabre defense. If there is potential for a Fabre defense, they will help you devise a plan ahead of time. With their knowledge of liability and familiarity with your specific case, your attorney can prepare the best strategy for the situation.
Get A Florida Personal Injury Lawyer
At The Law Offices of Scott Jay Senft, we make it our mission to help clients recover the compensation they are owed. Boasting over three decades of experience, our team of Florida personal injury lawyers is prepared to handle every step of the litigation process. With your case in good hands, you can relax and focus on your recovery. If you are ready to connect with a legal representative who will fight tirelessly on your behalf, we are available around the clock. Don’t hesitate to reach out today for a free consultation.